#Lilypond vs denemo code
#Lilypond vs denemo free

After that, he firmly pursued the decoding goal, and suceeded! What a satisfaction, and soon, here I am! Not wanting to use that program to read the musics, came to his thought creating me, a converter.įirst obstacle: closed data format, no documentation about it, would it be possible to decode that file structure? But after a while, he insisted on exploring techniques to reverse engineer data (he found this link from the site Wosit, when searching for the DWG format, he found the name of Frans Faase.), and there came the first surprize: the 'strings' command from GNU/Linux, showing that it is not a purely binary file, so probably it is not a cryptographed neither a compressed file format. Other site, which provides many scores '.enc' is:. One time he found a site about samba and 'choro', which provides several scores, however most of them are presented in the format Encore. My creator is an amateur musicist, he plays flute. So, that's not a matter of good quality, but easiness to (acquire and) use the application. This leads to many limitations, but for the normal user, that's not so important, what really matters is the no-need to learn so much, in order to use it. I have to acknowledge that Encore has a great feature: simplicity. Generally, people don't want to buy programs, if they easily find serials to unlock the demo edition, enabling to use it unlimited, at no cost.

But what really builds this popularity, I think, is the piracy. If one wants to buy, probably the price isn't so high, because there are many better alternatives. It's enough simple to be used by any one musicist. It's one of the first graphical music editor to appear. The Encore program is very popular in Brazil.

#Lilypond vs denemo free

Nevertheless, for those who prefer the easy way, see the alternatives (but again, this will not free you from the terrible command-line, if you should use me to not be in need for rewriting music already worked with Encore!). In spite of this, in my opinion, one would rather use the most direct method, to access all the features of Lily. So, now I'm ready to admit: yes, I am a spartan command-line program, did you think not, hum? Don't do that expression, man, life is good! The reason for this is very simple: if you use Lilypond, you don't need a graphical interface, do you? So, I am right to be like that!īut the good news (for you?) is: there are some higher level applications to edit lilypond files, through use of a graphical interface. You give me an '.enc' file, and I deliver to you another, with extension '.ly'. The following image demonstrates by fact what I tried to explain by words, it's a self-explanatory plot, I hope so.Īnd now that you are convinced about my usefulness on going from Encore to Lilypond, I'll show, with another image, where I fit in this proccess.Īctually it's very simple. Simple like that, the reason for my existence! Second, about Encore, everything the opposite to what I said about 'Lily'.

The file format for musical notation consists in a human readable and editable code, the syntax is easily learned, it is enough well documented, and completely free.

#Lilypond vs denemo code

Greetings from Brazil! I'm very happy that you are interested in my incredible hability to transform scores written with the application Encore (from GVOX, do not confuse with Adobe!) in a beautiful and well organized musical notation code for the application Lilypond.įirst, about Lilypond, in a few words: that's a great application! Its final results, direct in PDF, are beautiful, they are very compact and clear for reading. Enc2ly - free access to the musical format Encore